<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Hull of a victory for our side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwin.org.uk/2009/10/02/a-hull-of-a-victory-for-our-side/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwin.org.uk/2009/10/02/a-hull-of-a-victory-for-our-side/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Robinson</title>
		<link>http://ukwin.org.uk/2009/10/02/a-hull-of-a-victory-for-our-side/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwin.org.uk/?p=1367#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Hull City Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council are joint partners in the waste contract.
Yesterday ALL councillors of each Authority were, I understood, to be given full details of the PFI situation and such issues as the District Auditor&#039;s concern about monies wasted in connection with the waste programme. 
Whren i phoned a Hull councillor last night, she was unable to tell me anything about the matter. as &#039;It is all top secret&#039;. When I asked her if she had seen the press release issued by East Riding council, her comment was, &#039;What! What! What press release?&#039;
Two councils; joint waste policy; neither really talking to the other.

On a related issue, I asked to see the 2008 / 2009 accounts of both Authorities as is my right during the public scrutiny period. Hull refused. East RIding wouldn&#039;t let me see part of the 10-year-old waste contract. 
Using what information I was allowed to see, I was able to complain to the District Auditor that 
WRG may have overcharged by approx. £1.8 million in 2008 / 2009

The bill for the abortive PFI bid was probably £1.1 million in consultants&#039; fees alone.

£3.1 milllion is being witheld from WRG because they&#039;re not reaching agreed recycling targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hull City Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council are joint partners in the waste contract.<br />
Yesterday ALL councillors of each Authority were, I understood, to be given full details of the PFI situation and such issues as the District Auditor&#8217;s concern about monies wasted in connection with the waste programme.<br />
Whren i phoned a Hull councillor last night, she was unable to tell me anything about the matter. as &#8216;It is all top secret&#8217;. When I asked her if she had seen the press release issued by East Riding council, her comment was, &#8216;What! What! What press release?&#8217;<br />
Two councils; joint waste policy; neither really talking to the other.</p>
<p>On a related issue, I asked to see the 2008 / 2009 accounts of both Authorities as is my right during the public scrutiny period. Hull refused. East RIding wouldn&#8217;t let me see part of the 10-year-old waste contract.<br />
Using what information I was allowed to see, I was able to complain to the District Auditor that<br />
WRG may have overcharged by approx. £1.8 million in 2008 / 2009</p>
<p>The bill for the abortive PFI bid was probably £1.1 million in consultants&#8217; fees alone.</p>
<p>£3.1 milllion is being witheld from WRG because they&#8217;re not reaching agreed recycling targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

